Answer:
c) movement from a point inside the curve to a point on the curve.
Explanation:
Option C is correct because the production possibilities curve shows the combination of goods produced by the economy efficiently and any point inside the curve shows the inefficiency of the economy while the point outside the curve shows that the economy can not achieve it. Therefore, change in economic inefficiency to efficiency leads to move point from inside to the point on the curve.
Answer: The predetermined overhead rate increased because the total direct labor-hours dropped
Explanation:
The predetermined overhead rate refers to an allocation rate which is used in applying the estimated manufacturing overhead cost to the cost objects for a particular reporting period.
When there's reduction in the direct labor-hour requirement from 5 hours to 2 hours, the predetermined overhead rate increased because the total direct labor-hours dropped
The predetermined overhead rate is calculated as the total overhead cost divided by the machine hour. Therefore, if there's reduction in the direct labor hour rate, then there will be a rise in the predetermined overhead rate.
Portability should be the answer
Answer:
When labor unions successfully bargain for wage rates that are HIGHER THAN the equilibrium wage rate, they may cause AN INCREASE IN STRUCTURAL UNEMPLOYMENT.
Explanation:
When a labor union bargains for wages that are above equilibrium rate, this will produce the same effect as a price floor. The supply of labor will increase, while the demand for labor will decrease. This deadweight loss generated by high wages will result in an excess supply that will eventually lead to higher structural unemployment.
Answer:
"Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans"
Determining whether each statement is true or false:
a. False
b. True
c. False
d. True
Explanation:
The article "Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans," was published by the Washington Post on January 19, 2016. It was written by Chelsea Harvey. It tried to show how the world fish stock had been declining due to overfishing. This is why it provided a report contrary to the FAO report.
While the FAO report noted that the peak of worldwide catches was at 86 million tons in 1996, the contrary and independent report, using "catch reconstruction" showed that the peak was at 130 million tons in 1996. The reconstructed research also showed that worldwide fish catches had suffered declines ever since the 1996 peak, thereby threatening "world food security and marine ecosystems". The contrary report also suggested that all stakeholders must collaborate so that fish stocks can rebuild naturally.
