The position that describes Karl Marx's view of religion and society is his power with the connection to religion. Karl Marx as one of the most influential people in the history for he implemented various revolutionary actions which were condemned and criticized.
Answer: Proposal C
Explanation:
The way to solve this is to calculate the Present Values of all these payments. The smallest present value is the best.
Proposal A.
Periodic payment of $2,000 makes this an annuity.
Present value of Annuity = Annuity * ( 1 - ( 1 + r ) ^ -n)/r
= 2,000 * (1 - (1 + 0.5%)⁻⁶⁰) / 0.5%
= $103,451.12
Proposal B
Present value = Down payment + present value of annuity
= 10,000 + [2,200 * ( 1 - ( 1 + 0.5%)⁻⁴⁸) / 0.5%]
= 10,000 + 93,676.70
= $103,676.70
Proposal C
Present value = Present value of annuity + Present value of future payment
= [500 * (1 - (1 + 0.5%)⁻³⁶) / 0.5%] + [116,000 / (1 + 0.5%)⁶⁰]
= 16,435.51 + 85,999.17
= $102,434.68
<em>Proposal C has the lowest present value and so is best. </em>
When the bonds will mature, the company will receive, maturity value plus the interest earned on the bonds.
The maturity value will be the par value, as nothing is given, the bonds are redeemed at par value i.e. $ 46,000.
The interest income will be calculated as -
Interest Income = 7 % * $ 46,000 = $ 3,220
Thus, the total cash proceeds = $ 46,000 + $ 3,220 = $ 49,220
The privatization of public property was a vital task because the state was "land rich but money poor" and there is need to raise funds that could be used for infrastructure purposes such as funding elementary, secondary, higher education etc
<h2>What is
privatization?</h2>
Privatization refers to process where a government business, operation, property becomes a privately-owned property, business etc
In conclusion, the privatization of public property was a vital task because the state was "land rich but money poor" and there is need to raise funds that could be used for infrastructure purposes such as funding elementary, secondary, higher education etc
Read more about Privatization
<em>brainly.com/question/1086126</em>
Answer:
A.Yes. They have the power to remove it if they believe it’s harmful.
Explanation:
When the government have reasons to believe that a product is potentially harmful to consumers and or buyers, they have the right to require a company to recall a product, if they believe it is harmful to consumers, because it is then the governments responsibility to protect the public.
