Synthesis is the opposite of analysis. When you analyze, you break a whole into its parts and examine how the parts relate to one another in order to judge the quality of the whole. When you synthesize, you start with different, unrelated parts, and search out relationships in order to put the parts together to make a new whole. You synthesize automatically when you read, as you relate “new” text information to previous knowledge and create the new “whole” of your knowledge in a field. Synthesis becomes more of a conscious act when you write, since you have to actively select pieces of information that make sense together. As The American Heritage Dictionary states, synthesis means “the combining of separate elements or substances to form a coherent whole.”
The concept of a “coherent whole” is essential to synthesis. When you synthesize in writing, you examine different types of information (ideas, examples, statistics, etc., from different sources) and different themes (perspectives and concepts) from different sources with the purpose of blending them together to help explain one main idea. So you have to look for relationships 1) among the sources’ themes and 2) between these themes and your own ideas in order to blend all of the pieces to make a coherent whole.
The concept of a “coherent whole” is important in terms of language, too. Once you examine content and choose the parts to synthesize, you need to express those parts in your own language in order to create a coherent whole in terms of writing style.
Synthesis is like combining different ingredients to make a stew. If you choose and combine carefully, with the end result (supporting your main idea) in mind, the ingredients will be both separate and well-blended, with all ingredients contributing as they should to the final taste.
View the following video for a basic definition of, and introduction to, the concept of synthesis.
A, It demonstrates the speaker only has the poem to offer as a sign of his love.
The title says the words “I am Offering” then continues with “this poem” which makes me think that the poem is something that he offers, the poem he offers can/may be something to show his feelings. I chose A because it seems the most likely just from reading the title of the poem.
B doesn’t seem very likely because if it were to foreshadow that the speaker will offer great material sacrifices the title won’t really fit with it. Since it states that the speaker is offering the poem.
C.Might be a possibility but the title does not give off the vibe of hatred and if he were to declare his hatred for the recipient the title might not or there could have been better words than “I’m offering this poem”.
D. Doesn’t make sense because there was no wedding mentioned and the title doesn’t really fit with the happy occasion.
Answer:
Somehow get her out of the marriage with Paris?. I think.
Explanation:
I did Romeo and Juliet Freshman year.
Education is extremely important in ones life, it should be a privilege that everyone should be exposed too.
This goes against the honor code.
