The author shows authority by saying that hey know people who were hurt by the tragedy directly.
Explanation:
The author of the text is able to assert their authority over the text and its subject matter on the Jews by asserting that they have some personal ties tot he event.
They know the people who have been hurt in the holocaust thus they are able to give some information and that will be relevant to them.
One would wonder however, how only the personal contact of the author with the tragedy must give them authority and not them being author only.
Answer:
they should not because it would be bad for the economy
Explanation:
I would say B because the first sentence say she FEELS, which to me says she is establishing her own opinion
The correct way in which the given sentences are either a claim, an evidence or a reasoning are given below:
Statement 1: A study suggested that children who earned an allowance spent their money more carefully than those who did not.
Statement 2: Children should receive an allowance for chores done at home.
Statement 3: With an allowance, children learn about earning money and the value of money.
We shoiuld note that a claim is a statement which is made about something that has not been verified by supporting evidence, while an evidence is simply the proof which is used to validate a claim.
Additionally, a reasoning is a logical thought which weighs the pros and cons of a particular idea and selects the best option.
Read more about claims, reason and evidence here:
brainly.com/question/17494279
