You could say that he appealed to pathos. It's an appeal to emotion while ethos is to credibility. He used pathos to speak about sad things like secession and about the evils of slavery and why it should end. He didn't have to appeal to credibility because he was already the president so everyone knew why he was competent.
<span />
Answer:
The correct answer is option: Both governments encouraged citizens to participate in the decision-making process.
Explanation:
Both governments adopted democracy which would give people some power to influence the government.
The main difference between the two is that in Ancient Athenians, the citizens have the right to directly vote for the legislation.
In united states government, the citizens only have the right to vote for the representatives that would work for the legislation.
Answer:
All told, the movement of slaves from the Upper South to the Deep South made up one of ... while poor southern whites envisioned a day when they might rise enough in the world to ... How did the industrial revolution affect the slave economy and vice versa? ... Manifest Destiny: causes and effects of westward expansion.
Explanation:
Answer:
Clark sees the Lakota people as savages not only because he considers their way of living as less developed than his own, but because the racist organization of the society was a requirement for the colonialist endeavor.
Explanation:
Although assimilation was the official government policy, the natives never really got the promised chance to preserve their way of life as long as they could adapt to new demands. The real goal was to take the natives' lands, and that could only be accomplished by spreading paternalistic and racist ideas such as the belief that the natives were savages.
Answer: What is the question exactly???
