Answer: Religious individuals were targeted because they disagreed with what was happening. If anyone disagreed with what the Nazi party believed in-- along with Hitler in general-- They would be sentenced. Back then, they abused their power to a horrible extent. The sentencing question will be different with each person you ask. However, I believe that people who were religious should not have been charged or injured in any way. Nazis, on the other hand, deserve the same treatment that they gave.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include options or further references, we can say the following.
Different native peoples and outside countries competed for control of the northwest because they knew the kind of raw materials and natural resources of the Norwest. So Native American Indian tribes competed and fought with white Europeans that were interested in taking those lands and remove the Indians to exploit those raw materials in order to make big profits.
The crucial years were from 1774 to 1812. Many Europeans arrived at the Pacific Northwest to participate in the fur trade. We are talking about merchants from countries such as Russia, England, Portugal, Spain, and France. They tried to establish trade with different Native American tribes such as the Haida people, the Salish, and the Makah.
No, the courts decision was not fair to him. Dred Scott was told that he would be set free and yet he wasn’t, therefore the decision to have him remain a slave was unfair.
Answer:
he wasn't at fault it was inevitable
Explanation:
The USSR is more at fault. this is so because stalin had desired dominating the world through communsim
I don’t know the answer choices, but here’s what I can help you with.
In 1501, shortly after Christopher Columbus discovered America, Spain and Portugal began shipping African slaves to South America to work on their plantations. In the 1600s, English colonists in Virginia began buying Africans to help grow tobacco.