1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
3 years ago
5

What is the "contradiction" of the 1920s?

History
1 answer:
Dafna1 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

But the 1920s were an age of extreme contradiction. The unmatched prosperity and cultural advancement was accompanied by intense social unrest and reaction. The same decade that bore witness to urbanism and modernism also introduced the Ku Klux Klan, Prohibition, nativism, and religious fundamentalism.

You might be interested in
What is a caste system?
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

A hierarchy.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

4 0
2 years ago
True or false?<br> Manuel de Mier y Terán met with Stephen F. Austin in San<br> Felipe de Austin.
matrenka [14]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It was like a mid point

7 0
3 years ago
In the late 19th century, critics of big buisness claimed that monopolies in the united states harmed the economy by___?
IgorC [24]
Limiting competition, this is why they're frowned on today.
7 0
3 years ago
Which two indian tribes that were at war with each other, prompted the establishment of fort snelling?
nata0808 [166]
The correct answer: Dakota and Ojibwa

The tribes of the Dakota before European contact in the 1600's lived in the area around Lake Superior. In this timberland condition they lived by chasing, angling and assembling wild rice. They additionally developed some corn yet their area was close to the furthest reaches of where corn could be developed.

They battled with the Ojibwa (Chippewa) tribes for control of their locale. They Ojibwa acquired firearms from the French in the early piece of the eighteenth century and the Dakota tribes were headed to the territory instantly west of Lake Michigan and south of Lake Superior in what is currently Minnesota. A portion of the Dakotas started moving west into the Great Plains district. The Dakota tribes are regularly alluded to by the name Sioux. This depends on the name given to them by their foes the Objibwa. Sioux is a French debasement of the Objibwa word Nadoussioux which implied Adder snakes and in this way foe.

The names utilized by the Dakotas themselves for the different tribal vernacular gatherings were Dakota, Nakota and Lakota. The outcast names for these three gatherings were Santee, Wiciyela and Teton. In the Santee vernacular the word dakota implied partners.

At the point when the Lakotas left the Minnesota territory they embraced a more traveling life in light of steeds, teepees and chasing bison rather than bark houses and assembling wild rice. The Lakotas however did likewise take control of the Black Hills. The Santee or Dakota tribes were all the while living in the Minnesota amidst the nineteenth century. An uprising by the Santees brought about thrashing by the U.S. Armed force. A portion of the surviving Santee fled to Canada, others were set in reservations in Nebraska by the U.S. Armed force.

The Lakota or Tetons, who had changed themselves from an inactive timberland individuals into meandering wild ox seekers. The Lakota battled in the U.S. Armed force in what are known as the Sioux Wars, 1866-68 and 1876-77. It was the Lakota who wiped out General George Custer unit in 1876 at the Battle of the Little Big Horn in Montana. After the Lakota were quelled they were settled in reservations in North and South Dakota and somewhere else.
7 0
3 years ago
What arguments did supporters use What arguments did opponents of trusts use
dlinn [17]
Supporters: 

<span>1. This is business NOT a church picnic </span>
<span>2. Social Darwinism allows for the smartest, shrewdest, and wisest to rise above the weak-minded and cowardly in the business arena </span>
<span>3. Trusts help regulate quality and supply for the public </span>

<span>Opponents: </span>

<span>1. Trusts can set prices for the public thus eliminating fair and healthy competition </span>
<span>2. Trusts violate the free market system upon which American business is based </span>
<span>3. Trusts take advantage of small businesses and eventually lead to their death and destruction</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What the main cause of the french and indian war and how did it affect the colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes how an Arizona citizen could influence local political decisions?
    5·1 answer
  • What happened to segregation laws after the case of Plessy v. Ferguson? Segregation still existed, but only in very small towns
    12·1 answer
  • What was the Muslim ruler Akbar known for
    10·1 answer
  • What is one thing that Texans at home did NOT do to support the war effort during the First World War?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement regarding the Normandy (D-Day) invasion?
    8·1 answer
  • Can you please help me please
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a major grievances of the colonist toward England
    14·1 answer
  • Write in brief about the influence of religion during the Mauryan and Gupta empire
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the architect of the Missouri Compromise, also known as “The Great Compromiser”?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!