Answer:
It is that time of year again when South Africans celebrate National Senior Certificate results, ushering a generation of youth out of the school system and into the world. Of the 788,717 who successfully completed these exams, 186,058 achieved passes that potentially open the doors of university study.
As we read about the results, we take delight in the success stories, like the student from a poorer background scoring multiple distinctions despite having no properly qualified maths or science teacher. Or the rural student who earned a university entrance despite walking long distances to school each day. These achievements should be celebrated, as they are truly exceptional.
But the problem with these stories, uplifting as they may be, is that they often carry a subtext.
The presumption that hard work alone leads to success – and that laziness leads to failure – follows the student into the university. Here, despite a wealth of careful research that proclaims otherwise, most people believe that success emerges from the intelligence and work ethic of the individual.
In a recent journal article, we have argued that academics often ignore the research on student failure that shows it emerges from a number of factors. Many of these factors are beyond the attributes inherent in the student. Instead, most hold on to the simplistic common sense assumption that success comes to those who deserve it. Academics who hold this view are prone to assume that students are successful because of what an individual student does or does not do.
But the reality is a far more complex interplay of individual attributes with social structures which unfairly affect some more than others.
Explanation:
To earn affection from the people and to eventually encourage them to convert religion, the white man, Mr. Brown, put indirect efforts to bring people in to his side. He promoted schools to bring forth education to transact trades inclusive to all people regardless of their social and cultural upbringing. Answers are A and D
In Three Small Miracles, If Kelly had talked to Leah before her sister came into the room, Kelly may not have spoken to Leah. If at all, the story would have taken a different turn entirely given that Evelyn was now missing.
<h3>What is the referenced story about?</h3>
Three Small Miracles is a short story about three young children. In the story, Kelly is the protagonist (the main character).
Their parents had gone out but not without giving Kelly a responsibility (of taking care of the younger ones) which she is reluctant to carry out, hence a type of conflict called Character vs. Self.
As Kelly was getting off the phone, with Leah, his sister hands him a note that Evelyn had written to state that she had run away because she was in so much trouble.
See more exercises from The Three Small Miracles at:
brainly.com/question/4299830
