Answer:
1. Explain who in the United States would gain?
The government of the United States will gain from the<em> Import duties </em>that will be charged on the Indian textiles.
2. Who might lose from dismantling trade barriers between the United States and India?
<em>The USA will lose if trade barriers are dismantled.</em>
The United States will lose from dismantling trade barriers because the Indian textile will be massively imported in the country thereby crippling the growth of the local textile manufacturing companies in the United States. India has a comparative advantage over the USA in the manufacturing of textiles, which are in constant demand compared to that of the aircraft which are rarely demanded.
Explanation:
1. The government of the United States will gain from the<em> Import duties </em>that will be charged on the Indian textiles. The government will make huge revenues from the import duties since India will manufacture the textiles at the cheapest costs per unit and influx the USA with affordable and quality clothing.
2. The USA will lose if trade barriers are dismantled.
The United States will lose from dismantling trade barriers because the Indian textile will be massively imported in the country thereby crippling the growth of the local textile manufacturing companies in the United States. India has a comparative advantage over the USA in the manufacturing of textiles, which are in constant demand compared to that of the aircraft which are rarely demanded.
Answer:
1. positive externalities
2. educational credit for the market failure
3. redistribution
4. failure to maximize the family utility
Explanation:
There are generally four rationales or logical thinking for the public provisions for education. They are the positive externalities, failure to maximize the family utility, educational credit for the market failure, redistribution.
Now each rationales provides reasons that educations is more likely to be underprovided without any intervention from the government. But many of them does not provide any reasons for the mandate of education.
Like suppose the government can support and solve any educational credit market failure by just offering some loan guarantees for the students while letting them chose to receive education or not.
Similarly government can also address positive externalities that are associated with productivity gains or just letting a person educated without any mandating it.
And finally, government redistributes the poor families through the progressive taxation or the offerings of free education without any mandating them.
<span>The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, CFPB, believes your main goal should be not to accumulate more total student debt than you expect to earn as a starting salary once you leave school. Though your first year you won't be required to pay back every dollar you make to the government in loans, it helps when estimating how much you are going to be making and how much debt you wish to accrue.
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
The preparation of the statement of retained earnings for Amos Company is shown below:
Retained earnings at December 31, 2018 (before discovery of error) $858,000
Less: Depreciation expense two years ago -$45,600
Add: net income $209,000
Less: Cash dividends declared and paid during the year -$11,000
Retained earnings at December 31, 2019 $1,010,400
