1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
diamong [38]
4 years ago
10

The Bill of Rights

History
1 answer:
stepladder [879]4 years ago
6 0

1- On June 8, 1789, Representative James Madison introduced a series of thirty-nine amendments to the constitution of the House of Representatives. Among its recommendations Madison proposed the opening of the Constitution and the insertion of specific rights to limit the power of Congress in Article One, Section 9. Seven of these limitations would become part of the ten articles ratified the Bill of Rights of the amendments. Ultimately, on September 25, 1789, Congress approved twelve articles of amendment to the Constitution and presented them to the states for ratification. Contrary to the original proposal of Madison that the articles that can be incorporated into the main body of the Constitution, were proposed as additions "complementary" to it. Articles from three to twelve were ratified by the states.

2- On December 15, 1791, articles from three to twelve, after being ratified by the required number of states, became the one to ten amendments of the Constitution.

3- It was an answer to calm the fears of antifederalist groups, some of them influential opponents of the Constitution, and prominent members of the Philadelphia Convention, who argued that it failed to defend the basic principles of human freedom. These amendments guarantee a series of personal freedoms, limit the power of the government in judicial processes and others; and some faculties are reserved for the states and the people. Originally the modifications applied only to the federal government, however, most were subsequently applied to the government of each state through the Fourteenth Amendment through a process known as incorporation.

4-The Bill of Rights had little judicial impact for the first 150 years of its existence, but it was the basis for many of the decisions of the Supreme Court from the 20th century onwards. The Bill of Rights plays a central role in American law and in his government, and continues to be a fundamental symbol of the nation's freedom and culture.

You might be interested in
Chile, Peru, and Venezuela are each considered unitary governments. A main characteristic of a unitary government is that it
Vitek1552 [10]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C) is allowed to make rules and laws which are technically unconstitutional." Chile, Peru, and Venezuela are each considered unitary governments. A main characteristic of a unitary government is that it <span>is allowed to make rules and laws which are technically unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
1. Why were the northern Italian city states so wealthy during the Renaissance?
Svetlanka [38]

During the period of the Renaissance, Italy was divided into numerous small city-states controlled by local wealthy people. There were large differences though from one city-state to another, and while the northern ones were very wealthy and had things going very smoothly, the southern ones were much less successful.

The reason why the northern Italian city-states were so wealthy was mostly the trade. These city-states had excellent large ports. They were producing multiple things that were in high demand and also very well paid for for export, and were getting lot of things they needed and desired from the other parts of the world.

These states had very well developed fleets, and they were trading with multiple Asian regions, Europe, as well as parts of Africa. They were exporting their high quality products. Very often they were buying certain things from one place, then re-sell it in other place buy much higher prices, thus getting more and more wealth over time. That wealth enabled them to get all they needed without any problem, thus making them very stable and strong small states.

4 0
3 years ago
PIZ help this is the last history activity last one plz plz help me!
Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

See below  

Explanation:

  1. 60N 120W = Canada
  2. 30N 0 = Africa
  3. 30S 90E = None of the above. It's in the Indian Ocean (They could have meant 30S 90W. That's in the Pacific Ocean, which is on the list but hasn't been used).
  4. 45N 90W = United States
  5. 60N 90E = Russian Federation
  6. 30S 60W = South America
  7. 90S 90W = Antarctica
  8. 30S 30W = Atlantic Ocean
  9. 0 30E = Africa
  10. 30N 120E = China
  11. 30S 60W = South America
  12. 30S 150E = Australia
3 0
3 years ago
Will Upvote all Answers . plz help
vivado [14]
Test his freinds ..........
5 0
3 years ago
Do you think having only two parties in power in the US is good or bad for our country? Why?​
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. <u>This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad </u>

Here is another argument

While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. <u>This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.</u>    

Explanation:

It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.  

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where were the majority of industries
    6·1 answer
  • The French neuroscientist who helped legitimatize the practice of hypnosis was
    15·2 answers
  • How did the spread of the ottoman empire affect european trade?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Jamestown settlement nearly fail?
    12·2 answers
  • The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common
    10·2 answers
  • Why do we talk about the 2nd Great<br> Awakening before the other reform<br> movements?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the greatest danger that population growth has posed to the natural environment? It has increased the hunting of wild an
    6·1 answer
  • What might have caused these changes to the map of Canada?
    9·1 answer
  • Which democratic principle of the US system of government is the house of representatives in?
    12·1 answer
  • What steps taken by the colonists suggest they were preparing for war with Britain ?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!