Answer:
Option C.
Explanation:
If the constitution forbids unreasonable searches, there must be a reasonable right to privacy, is the right answer.
Griswold v. Connecticut was a milestone lawsuit in the history of the United States concerning the access to contraception. This case included a Connecticut "Comstock law" which outlawed anyone from using "any drug, therapeutic item or instrument to impede conception."
The court ruled that the ordinance was unconstitutional by giving evidence that the law infringed the "right to matrimonial privacy", placing the foundation for the right to privacy concerning intimate manners. Accordingly, in this case, the decision was based upon if the constitution prohibits unreasonable searches, there must be a reasonable right to privacy
I found an excerpt with the above question. It also had choices.
The excerpt goes like this:
I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures... If we falter in our leadership, we may endanger the peace of the world - and we shall surely endanger the welfare of our own nation. - President Harry Truman, 1947
The choices given were:
<span>a.
</span>Regional
wars in South America
<span>b.
</span>The spread of communism
<span>c.
</span>Civil disobedience in U.S. cities
<span>d.
</span>The formation of the United Nations
<span>e.
</span><span>The rise of the military industrial complex</span>
Based on the excerpt, the threat President Truman was referring to was:
B. THE SPREAD OF COMMUNISM.
