1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nostrana [21]
3 years ago
11

Your boss, Penny Dirks, has asked you to analyze the airline industry using Porter's Three Generic Strategies. Which of the foll

owing companies are using a cost leadership strategy?
A.Southwest, Horizon, Frontier, JetBlue
B. British Airways, Singapore Airlines, Virgin Atlantic
C. Sky Taxi - a rent by the hour personal plane service
D. All of these choices
Business
1 answer:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A.

Explanation:

Low cost companies, such as Southwest, Horizon, Frontier and JetBlue, are already one of the first options when organizing a trip. Flying is easier and more accessible every day, partly thanks to the low prices that airlines offer us, but also more uncomfortable, so you may ask yourself: what tricks do airlines use to make flying so cheap now?

  1. Point to point routes. Low-cost companies do not offer transshipment services (network), so they save the cost of moving luggage from one plane to another and do not have to worry about the costs of connections between their routes.
  2. Staff costs. When operating point-to-point flights and only short and medium radius, low cost never pay hotels to their crews to spend the night outside the airport where they are destined. Pilots and cabin staff always return to their base. In addition, their salaries are usually lower than those of traditional airline personnel.
  3. Small airports. Operating in small airports and far from the main urban centers allows these airlines to avoid traffic jams, thus saving fuel and time.
  4. Homogeneous fleet. Low cost usually use modern fleets and similar models, allowing them significant savings in maintenance.
  5. Reduced services. These low-cost airlines do not serve meals, cut seat space and eliminate seat allocation, which saves a lot of time, but also money.
  6. Additional income. Most low-cost airlines promote a wide range of gifts and lotteries on board, which gives them significant extra income.
  7. It pays for everything. The reservation of tickets, billing at a counter and the right to carry a suitcase in the hold of the plane is paid with low-cost airlines.
  8. Less expenses at the airport. Many low cost even give up having customer service offices, replacing them with call centers that involve a high cost of calling.
  9. Public incentives. Many public administrations grant great economic aid to these low costs to prevent them from stopping to fly to their airports.
  10. Very high rotation. Companies basically care about two things: get the maximum number of flights and fill the planes to the maximum. A plane is only profitable when it is flying, so more flights, more profitability.
You might be interested in
An increase in spending of $25 billion increases real gdp from $600 billion to $700 billion. The marginal propensity to consume
maksim [4K]

An increase in spending of $25 billion increases real gdp from $600 billion to $700 billion. The marginal propensity to consume must be "4".

<h3>What do you mean by Marginal Propensity to consume?</h3>

The marginal propensity to consume is refers to as the proportion of any change in income that is spent on consumption.

In economics, this term is used to refer to the measurement made in order to determine consumption when the rent is increased by one unit. This measurement is nothing more than a mathematical relationship to calculate how people invest in consumption or save the income that is increased.

Calculation:

MPC=\frac{change in consumption}{change in income} \\MPC=\frac{100}{25} \\MPC=4

Learn more about Marginal Propensity to consume, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/19089833

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Jon described that there are "Three Circles" when it comes to finding a job. Identify and describe each of the "Three Circles" i
Kay [80]

Answer:

well one is what your passion is. like what you like. what people will pay you to do and how much. and what you are good at.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Refer to exhibit 4-1. in a free market, ________ units of the good would be exchanged. with a price ceiling, _______ units of th
solniwko [45]
The answer is option "<span>d. 125; 75".
</span>
Free market alludes to an economy where the legislature or government forces few or no confinements and directions on purchasers and sellers. In a free market, members figure out what items are created, how, when and where they are made, to whom they are offered, and at what value—all in light of free market activity.
4 0
3 years ago
In which ways did munsterberg suggest that psychologists could contribute to industry?
kenny6666 [7]

Munsterberg suggest that psychologists could contribute to industry in the ways as listed below:

  • Identifying people suitable for a specific job
  • Identifying the psychological conditions that will bring out the best from a worker
  • identifying optimum management strategies that will unite the employees to the organization's goal

<h3>Who is a psychologist?</h3>

A psychologist refers to an expert in psychology where psychology studies the mental health. This discipline deals greatly in how human behaves and the reason for such behavior.

Psychologists play a greater impact in making people act in a certain way since they can guess intelligently on the expected behavior of an individual under a given circumstance. This abilities of psychologists enabled Munsterberg to make the suggestions listed

Read more on psychology here: brainly.com/question/12011520

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Sweden has real GDP per capita of $50,000, while Chile has real GDP per capita of $25,000. If real GDP per capita in Sweden grow
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

option (B) 35 years

Explanation:

Given:

Real per capita GDP of Sweden = $50,000

Real per capita GDP of Chile = $25,000

Growth rate of Sweden = 2%

Growth rate of Chile = 4%

As per the Rule of 70, the economy's GDP doubles in \frac{\textup{70}}{\textup{Growth rate}}

Therefore,

The GDP of Sweden will double in = \frac{\textup{70}}{\textup{2}} = 35 years

and,

Chile will double in \frac{\textup{70}}{\textup{4}} = 17.5 years

Therefore,

in 35 years the GDP of Sweden will be $100,000

and,

In 35 years the GDP of Chile will also be ($50,000 in 17.5 years and $100,000 in next 17.5 years) = $100,000

Therefore,

The real GDP per capita in the two nations to converge in 35 years

Hence,

The correct answer is option (B) 35 years

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The economy is in the horizontal portion of the AS curve, investment spending is interest insensitive and there is no liquidity
    8·1 answer
  • The LIFO cost flow assumption results in the most (distant/recent) costs being transferred to cost of goods sold. In times of ri
    9·1 answer
  • Negative margin is when the value of the service, good, or resource does not complete cover the cost. theoretically, by reducing
    8·1 answer
  • When government expenditures increase, the interest rate
    10·1 answer
  • You are to make monthly deposits of $450 into a retirement account that pays an apr of 10.7 percent compounded monthly. if your
    7·1 answer
  • How does increasing the size of your down payment impact your auto loan?
    5·1 answer
  • Ben wants to purchase a new tablet. He spends a lot of time researching the latest features available on different brands of tab
    8·1 answer
  • Scientific managment principals are out dated today business managment. comment on​
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is least likely to be a theme in a novel about young people going to war?
    5·1 answer
  • How do you feel about the pandemic? Vaccinations? Masks?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!