This is the fundamental idea behind Ethical Subjectivism. Ethical Subjectivism holds that our moral judgments are solely based on our emotions. This perspective holds that there is no such thing as "objective" right or wrong. There are numerous distinctions between Simple Subjectivism and Emotivism.
This paper will compare and contrast both theories, as well as explain why Simple Subjectivism cannot account for moral disagreement and Emotivism can, but incorrectly. By arguing these two ethical points, I can better explain or make a claim about how moral disagreements should be understood.
For several theories contending only ethical standard of judgement is individual's.
To learn more about ethical, click here
brainly.com/question/14890010
#SPJ4
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u></u>
growth_multiplier is 1.1
savings = 100
desc = "compound interest
"
# Place product of growth_multiplier and savings to year 1
Year 1 = growth_multiplier* savings
# Print
print(type(year1))
Now,
# Place addition of desc & desc
doubledesc will be desc + desc
# Print doubledesc
print(doubledesc)
<u></u>
To enhance our ability to assess and manage risk in specific driving situations we should assume that a dangerous situation may occur.
Given an incomplete sentence related to the ability to manage and assess the risk in specific driving situations.
We are required to fill the blank given in the sentence so that the sentence will give adequate meaning.
The words which are to be filled in the sentence are "assume that a dangerous situation may occur",
While driving there is a risk of accident so when someone is assessing the risk of specific driving then he has to take in consideration that any dangerous situation can occur. We know that the thinking that the accident may occur is negative but an analysts has to think multidimensional.
Hence to enhance our ability to assess and manage risk in specific driving situations we should assume that a dangerous situation may occur.
Learn more about risk at brainly.com/question/24129294
#SPJ4
