Base on my research this type of argument is baseless but it depends on the 100% free enterprise market system. With this system, the government doesn't have regulatory powers to protect the interest of the consumers from the financial institutions. In a situation that without the interest rate modulation, the rate charged on loans could be 40% while the rate paid on savings could be 1%. If this happens the financial institutions will not have to pay FDIC insurance to ensure the solvency of the overall system.
Answer and Explanation:
The tax consequences for the following events -
a. The organization should record the amount of $10,000 in the year 2018 as they followed the cash basis and the cheque should be equal to the cash also troy could not able to record the bonus till it is actually collected
b. As per the accrual basis, the income should be recorded when they are earned not when they are received so the corporation should record the income in the year 2018 as the agent performed the service
c. Since the restrictions that are imposed on cheque for payment purpose should be treated as the substantial and the cheque should not be equivalent to the cash because the customer told that check should be held till Jan 2019 so the income should not be recorded in 2018
Answer:
Percent tax = 45%
Explanation:
Given:
Amount of tax charged = $1,152
Amount of purchase = $2,560
Find:
Percent tax
Computation:
Percent tax = [Amount of tax charged / Amount of purchase]100
Percent tax = [1152 / 2560]100
Percent tax = 45%
This is a probability question
Aspiring entrepreneurs can go to the internet, experienced entrepreneurs, Chambers of Commerce, Small Businessn Administration (SBA), college/university, or the community to get their questions answered. Hope this helps.
