1) le titire
2)le nom de compositer: s'il s'agit d'une ouvre vocale, indiquer l'auteur du text
3)le nom de l'interprète s'il s'agit d'une chanson
Without wasting money, A., because many clothes that people think are "in style" are quite expensive, and people end up spending more than they make. They purchase too much, or purchase clothes with too high of a price, but they really don't actually need all of the clothes, so that counts as wasting. Also, depleting money can't be because that means deleting money, (how the heck are you gonna do that? :P), it's not spending money, because in order to get clothes, (or get fabric to MAKE clothes), you DO have to spend money in order to get it. Finally, WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU CONSUME MONEY?!?!? :P Consuming means eating, so why would you eat money, when you could use it to donate to the poor, or help feed hungry children, or even help pay for some supplies to build houses for homeless people?
Look, some advice from me is that instead of trying to "fit in", or be in the "latest style", you could really change someone's life and become popular for your good DEEDS, not for what you WEAR.
Be that change that you wish to see in this world.
I hope I helped! =D
Answer: So basically In the movie The Hangover Part 2, Stu, the character played by actor Ed Helms, wakes up with a facial tattoo identical to that boxer Mike Tyson, who also appears in the film. Before the movie was released, the artist who designed and tattooed Mr. Tyson sued Warner Brothers in federal court for infringement. The suit delayed release of the film for several months, and prevented the studio from showing the tattooed actor in trailers or clips of the film. The suit was later settled for an undisclosed amount, and the movie was then released intact. What would be the best form of protection for the intellectual property in a tattoo? The answer isn the movie The Hangover Part 2, Stu, the character played by actor Ed Helms, wakes up with a facial tattoo identical to that boxer Mike Tyson, who also appears in the film. Before the movie was released, the artist who designed and tattooed Mr. Tyson sued Warner Brothers in federal court for infringement. The suit delayed release of the film for several months, and prevented the studio from showing the tattooed actor in trailers or clips of the film. The suit was later settled for an undisclosed amount, and the movie was then released intact. What would be the best form of protection for the intellectual property in a tattoo? which leads me to believe n the movie The Hangover Part 2, Stu, the character played by actor Ed Helms, wakes up with a facial tattoo identical to that boxer Mike Tyson, who also appears in the film. Before the movie was released, the artist who designed and tattooed Mr. Tyson sued Warner Brothers in federal court for infringement. The suit delayed release of the film for several months, and prevented the studio from showing the tattooed actor in trailers or clips of the film. The suit was later settled for an undisclosed amount, and the movie was then released intact. What would be the best form of protection for the intellectual property in a tattoo? and finally n the movie The Hangover Part 2, Stu, the character played by actor Ed Helms, wakes up with a facial tattoo identical to that boxer Mike Tyson, who also appears in the film. Before the movie was released, the artist who designed and tattooed Mr. Tyson sued Warner Brothers in federal court for infringement. The suit delayed release of the film for several months, and prevented the studio from showing the tattooed actor in trailers or clips of the film. The suit was later settled for an undisclosed amount, and the movie was then released intact. What would be the best form of protection for the intellectual property in a tattoo?
Explanation:
You would call it overlapping