Answer:
we conclude that the function is one-to-one.
Step-by-step explanation:
A function will a one-to-one function if it
- passes the vertical line test to make sure it is indeed a function, and
- also a horizontal line test to make sure it is it one-to-one.
In other words,
The function will be one-to-one if it passes the vertical line test, and also if the horizontal line only cuts the graph of the function in one place.
The reason is that there must be only one x-value for each y-value.
Given the function
Have a look at the attached graph.
- The red portion represents the graph of the function .
- The green portion represents the graph of x=2 which is basically a vertical line test. Vertical line indicates that it cuts the cuts the graph of the function in one place. So it is clear that is indeed a function.
- The blue line represents the graph of y=9, which is basically a horizontal line test. Horizontal line indicates that it cuts the cuts the graph of the function in one place. So it is clear that is a one-to-one function, as there is only one x-value for each y-value.
Therefore, we conclude that the function is one-to-one.
Answer: 6 km to 22 km !
Step-by-step explanation:
the distances from the school mall to bus station could be, in the worst case, 14+8=22 km apart, and in the best case 14-8=6 km apart
so the range is 6 km to 22 km !
Answer:
65 people.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to work backwards.
We end with 63 people, and at the stop we lost 19 people and gained 17.
; if x = # people at the beginning
There were 65 people on the train to begin with.
Ik you asked for one but here's a couple: 1,2,4,8,16,32
Answer:
The correct option is;
(3) The sample of track athletes show that there is a correlation between foot size and running speed
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements are analysed as follows;
(1) Smaller foot sizes cause track athletes to run slower.
The above statement is a conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement because there are other factors such as taller athletes run faster than average sized athletes
(2) The sample of track athletes shows a causal relationship between
foot size and running speed.
The above statement is similar to the one above as it is a milder conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement
(3) The sample of track athletes shows a correlation between foot size
and running speed.
The above statement is correct as is directly supported by the data as it is a statement made based directly the data
(4) There is no correlation between foot size and running speed in
track athletes.
The above statement is not supported by the available data.
