1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nydimaria [60]
3 years ago
14

why might an empire like the austrian empire not support efforts of nationalism to form their own country

History
1 answer:
max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
6 0

<span><span>
</span><span><span>The congress of Vienna, summoned by the four powers who have done most to defeat Napoleon (Britain, Russia, Prussia, Austria), is an attempt to stabilize the map of Europe after the upheavals caused by more than twenty years of war. All the crowned heads and their representatives are welcome in Vienna, with the result that there is much entertainment and glamorous festivity throughout the winter of 1814-15.Behind the glitter, orchestrated by Metternich, the hard work of diplomacy goes on. The four great nations intend to make all the decisions themselves, but Talleyrand - representing the newly restored Louis XVIII - ensures that France has an equal place at the table. Her participation in any agreed balance of power will be essential. </span></span><span><span>Everyone is well aware that a breakdown in the negotiations can easily lead to a renewal of war, in the familiar pattern of recent years. Yet each participant has a vested interest in ensuring that none of the others becomes too strong. The main players are like heavily armed gangsters who nevertheless need to clinch a deal.Danger lies primarily in Poland and Saxony, the much fought over regions bordered by Russia, Prussia and Austria. Poland has already been dismembered by her neighbours before being partly reconstituted by Napoleon - as a grand duchy which he grants to the king of Saxony. (Saxony remains a French ally longer than anyone else and thus ends up on the losing side.) </span></span><span><span>Eventually the major powers reach a compromise in Vienna, to the predictable detriment of Poland and of a much reduced Saxony. In most other areas this congress of conservative monarchies restores the pre-Napoleonic status quo. Just as Louis XVIII returns to the French throne, so Naples is restored to the Bourbons, the papal states to the pope, and much of northern Italy to Austria.Among the more important changes, the larger German states keep their gains from the process of rationalization introduced by Napoleon; Denmark loses Norway to Sweden; and a new kingdom of the Netherlands links the Austrian Netherlands (or Belgium) and the United Provinces, as a barrier to renewed French expansion northwards. </span></span><span>Austria by now has no objection to relinquishing the Austrian Netherlands. But decisions of this kind are old-fashioned diplomacy, conducted between crowned heads and bearing little relation to the wishes or identity of people in the affected areas. Partly for this reason, the newly created kingdom of the Netherlands lasts only fifteen years before splitting apart.

Nevertheless in most respects the negotiators at Vienna succeed in their primary aim of finding a basis for peace. Most of their solutions hold good for several decades. The new Europe of the 19th century is no longer characterized by frequent wars. Instead, each nation is confronted internally by the likelihood of revolution.</span></span><span>

Read more:<span>http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?ParagraphID=mnx#ixzz4dJcc9T00</span></span>
You might be interested in
What advantage did industrialization give Europe one colonizing?
lorasvet [3.4K]

Industrialization gave Europe many advantages when colonizing.

  1. Weapons- They had superior weapons to native people such as guns
  2. Medicine- They had developed vaccines (such as quinine for malaria) to common diseases that helped the European settlers survive.

These are the top 2 reasons off the top of my head. Ask me if you need more!

3 0
2 years ago
Why did Prime Minister Nehru's decision to invade the Portuguese colony of Goa, put President Kennedy in a difficult position?
Archy [21]

Answer:

Nehru's attack on Goa would weaken capitalist forces worldwide, facilitating the spread of communism. This hindered the policy advocated by Kennedy.

Explanation:

Nehru was the prime minister of India and in addition to having to defend the country from the communist threat that was growing because of China and Russia, he had to defend the country from European colonialism.

The Goa region, in Inida, was still dominated and occupied by the Portuguese, forcing Nehru to order an attack to be made in that region, so that the Portuguese could be expelled. President Kennedy saw this as a major threat to capitalist forces, as Portuguese was a capitalist ally and India too. If a capitalist country provoked another capitalist country, it would make capitalism seen as a weak policy and incapable of promoting peace. This would allow communism to move forward with great force.

7 0
2 years ago
Following the Protestant Reformation, Southwestern Europe continued to primarily follow what
notka56 [123]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
please help In what sense was Clinton's success in domestic policy "mixed"? first answer gets brainliest
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

The reasons that made Clinton a success in domestic policy are:

Previous periods left the country in deficit and he rebalanced the government budget and spending to fulfill that gap and increase the government covering.

Because even when the government wanted to cut medicare budget, and he presented a plan to keep it working without any cuts.

Because due to the lack of funds part of the government was going to shut down its duties, but he managed to convince the fed to cut interests, rebalance the budget, and then increase the budget to give more to the people.

Explanation:

First of all, we need to understand something, the country was in a state of chaos because previous governments had spent so much money they were in debt and they had to cut several essential programs to keep the basic government duties on. However, he analyzed the situation and re-balanced the budget to keep everything working as well as convincing the FED president to cut interest rates, as well as to a plan to boost the economy. One of his major contributions was the prevail of medicare.

7 0
2 years ago
What is a main characteristic of jazz music?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Explanation:

jazz artists follow traditional rhythms and structures

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What goods and services have people traded throughout history
    11·1 answer
  • Need help? Some one plis
    7·2 answers
  • Why are books and films helpful in remembering the Holocaust? What kind of moral messages do they teach us?
    6·1 answer
  • President Lincoln developed a plan of Reconstruction to restore
    15·1 answer
  • Which was more effective slavery or pro slavery?
    15·1 answer
  • This issue would cause South Carolina to threaten to secede (seperate) from the United States
    6·1 answer
  • Who took Fort Detroit from the British?
    14·2 answers
  • What issues divided the Republicans during Reconstruction?
    13·1 answer
  • Why were black Americans afraid to testify against whites in the south? What does their fear reveal about justice in the south a
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following individuals
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!