Hello There!
____________________________________________________________
It would be motivation, ability and opportunity.
____________________________________________________________
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
- Hannah ❤
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A is wrong bc America is classified as developed nation but doesn't have free health care
C is wrong bc again, America has been using capitalism system for a long time
D using America as example again, has many allies
People not paying child support or sufficient funds.
