<em>Se puede ganar mucho, desde el punto de vista empírico yanalítico, del estudio comparativo sistemático de Canadá y Estados
</em>
<em>Unidos. </em><em>Ambos países comparten muchas condiciones ecológicas y demográficas</em><em>; sus niveles de desarrollo económico y de
</em>
<em>movilidad social son similares, y culturalmente tienen también
</em>
<em>mucho en común. Sin embargo, existen claros ejemplos de sus
</em>
<h3>DIFERENCIASS</h3>
Since I don't know what "these" refers to here, I will just assume that the question addresses social networks generally.
Some impacts are:
Positive
-better information
-security (you can mark people safe during Earthquake)
-faster contact with peopl
-possibility of forming groups
-additional communication platform
Negative:
-less privacy
-lack of control over data
-being able to spy on people
-being able to find things from the past
-bosses spying on their workers
I would say its stoicism, all great stoics discussed that in life, there will be ups and downs, but when you see all as the same, they wont matter. and you can focus on small wonders of life.
As rudyard kipling wrote in his poem ""if''"
''if you can meet with triumph and disaster and treat those two imposters just the same'' .... Then you will be a man my son.
<span>Members of Washington's cabinet were split, with some supporting England (some felt this would be a sign of good faith) & some supporting France (some felt obligated to help France as repayment for France's aid during the American Revolution). Washington chose to remain neutral, as he felt the U.S. was too vulnerable to engage in a war.</span>
Answer:
Laissez-faire
One of the most influential ideas of the Gilded Age was laissez-faire (pronounced LAY-zay FAIR). From the French for “let them do [what they will],” proponents of laissez-faire policies, known as liberals, believed that the free market would naturally produce the best and most efficient solutions to economic and social problems. In other words, it was best to allow businesses to do what they wanted: trade freely, set their own prices, and determine workers’ wages and working conditions.
Liberalism, as it was known in the late nineteenth century, had a very different definition than it does today: instead of advocating for government intervention to solve social problems as today’s liberals do, liberals in the Gilded Age opposed most government intervention in the economy or labor relations. Libertarians are the closest equivalent to Gilded Age liberals in US politics today.
Laissez-faire combined the principles of limited government and the free market with some of the ideas of Social Darwinism. Applying Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to human institutions, liberals believed that competition was necessary for progress. Any measures that interfered with complete freedom—defined as the freedom to buy and sell your labor and property any way you chose—were contrary to natural selection and impeded the march of civilization.
During the Gilded Age, this belief that laissez-faire capitalism produced optimal results for society came into conflict with the efforts of reformers and labor unions to rein in the influence of big businesses.