Answer:
Mexican-American -war
Explanation:
A border skirmish along the Rio Grande started off the fighting and was followed by a zone between the Rio Grande and Nueces River that both countries had previously With the losses adding up, Mexico turned to old standby General Antonio López
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
