Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
The correct answer is c. it could only request states for funds
That was because the government wasn't centralized as everyone was afraid that it could become a tyrannical government.
The answer is true I’m pretty sure but double check to make sure :)
