Answer:
The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:
B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, <u>Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.</u>
The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism.<u> Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.</u>
Answer:
The Texas legislature has a wide range of committee jurisdiction which is often not definite and this gives the leaders power to choose among several committees
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is a.
Explanation:
A caste system is a form of social stratification where a certain lifestyle, rights, obligations, and societal expectations are ascribed to individuals or social groups by virtue of their lineage. Caste societies are strictly hierarchical and highly unequal: <u>how scarce resources and social rewards in a society are distributed according to one's caste</u>, and any other form of arrangement or distribution of resources is difficult or impossible. Social mobility in caste systems is very rare or not seen at all.
The answer to the question above is 61%.
In the year of 2005, the Gallup poll asks respondents how they would rate the honesty and ethical standards of the people in the different fields and the answer to this is 61%.
This is illustrated in communication accommodation theory.
The theory was first proposed by Howard Giles in the 20th century. According to the theory, we try to accommodate into our partner's communication as much as they are trying to accommodate into ours. So in this case, both Brenda and her American friends have been trying to adapt to each other's behavior when it comes to communication.
