Answer:
External validity
Explanation:
External validity: In research, the term "external validity" is described as the extent or degree to which a researcher can generalize his or her findings to distinct groups of individuals, measures, and situations.
-External validity of specific research is considered as good or high when it can be applicable to some other people, setting, times, and experiments whereas it is considered as low when it can't be applied to any other situation.
In the question above, the given statement represent external validity.
Answer: Burgess originally meant a freeman of a borough (England, Wales, Ireland) or burgh (Scotland). It later came to mean an elected or unelected official of a municipality, or the representative of a borough in the English House of Commons. The term was also used in some of the American colonies. The House of Burgesses was the first elected general assembly in the colonies, paving the way for the democratic society formed during the Revolution. After a general assembly was established in Virginia, other English colonies demanded their own elected bodies of government.
Explanation:
In Yellowstone the Pike fish were eating all of the trout causing the bear to eat the deer causing the wolves to not have food and therefor throwing the whole ecosystem out of balance
The government in the free enterprise system enables the government to ensure the safety and the requirement of the citizens by solving poverty and organizing the market fairs.
<h3>What is a free enterprise system?</h3>
The free enterprise system has been the market-oriented economy of the system that governs the product and the market need rather than the government.
Free enterprise has the role of the government in the following terms:
- To ensure the safety of its citizen
- To enable the meeting of all the requirements of the citizens
- To solve the problem of poverty
- To ensure a fair market
Learn more about the free enterprise system, here:
brainly.com/question/13297799
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>b</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Here's a clearer rendering of the text.
Carefully follow the passage;
<em>The endless debate within anthropology, about whether culture is "subjective" or "objective", is conceived in a totally erroneous way. Since human behavior is seen as symbolic action, the problem whether culture is a standardized conduct or a state of mind or even both together, somehow loses its meaning. </em>
What should be asked about a gesture like a hug or two kisses, is:
a. If the culture accepts this type of gesture.
<u> b. What is the importance of this gesture and what is being transmitted by it.</u>
c. If several cultures have adopted the same gesture to say the same thing.
d. Whether the gestures should be objective or subjective.
e. Whether the culture really exists or is just a convention.
