All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following are effective means of aligning management goals with shareholder interests?

Business

1 answer:

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

E. I, II, III, and IV

Explanation:

All of the mentioned strategies would work.

Employee stock option provides the enthusiasm and energy to perform good among employees. This is beneficial for the company and shareholders as well.

The threat of takeover, scares the shareholders in losing their share, and effective voting right. Also the management feels threaten as the new company might replace them with the management personnel they desire.

Management bonuses help management to get a boost in energy and accordingly motivates to work good, also the shareholders desiring performance will find it effective.

The threat of proxy fight engages both the parties to behave properly towards each other and respect each other.

You might be interested in

Suppose for a given consumer the marginal utility (MU) of a pizza is 100 utils and the MU of a hamburger is 80 utils, and that t

NemiM [27]

Answer:

<u>is not</u> , <u>consume more of hamburgers</u>

Explanation:

A consumer is said to have achieved equilibrium when within his budget constraint, he purchases that combination of two goods which yield maximum satisfaction to him.

The equation for consumer equilibrium for two products is given by

$\frac{MU_{x} }{P_{x} } = \frac{MU_{y} }{P_{y} }$

In the given case, $\frac{MU_{x} }{P_{x} }$ = $\frac{100}{15}$ = $\frac{20}{3}$ = 6.666

$\frac{MU_{y} }{P_{y} }$ = $\frac{80}{10}$ = 8

wherein, x= pizza

y= hamburger

As is evident, the marginal utility per dollar spent is greater in case of a hamburger, the consumer is not in a state of equilibrium.

Thus, he should consume more units of Hamburgers in order to maximize his utility.

3 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes a recession?

jekas [21]

Answer:

D. A large number of people are unemployed and have decreased spending power.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jessica is a one-third owner in Bikes-R-Us, an S corporation that experienced a $45,000 loss this year (year 1).

Arlecino [84]

Answer:

a. $15,000

b. $10,000 & $3,000

c. $3,000

Explanation:

a. The amount of loss deducted in a year will be equal to the stock basis in the company.

The excess amount of loss will be carry to the future years and deducted, if there is conditional stock basis in the company.

The amount is Jessica allowed to deduct in year 1: ($45,000 x 1/3) = $15,000

b. Her stock and debt bases in the corporation at the end of year 1:

=> Stock basis at the end of year 1: $10,000 - $10,000 = 0

=> Remaining amount of loss: $15,000 - $10,000 = $5,000 => Remaining loss: $5,000 - $3,000 = $2,000

So, Jessica has a suspended loss of $2,000 at the end of year 1

c. The profit is $12,000

Share of J: $12,000 x 1/3 = $4,000

Out of this $4,000, the $3,000 (one-third) will be its debt basis and $1,000 will be stock basis.

The amount of $2,000 loss will first be deducted from the stock basis and then from the debt basis.

3 0

2 years ago

In a market economy with perfect competition, sellers

Annette [7]

Answer:

There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing.

6 0

3 years ago

Timing of entry into the Indian market brought different results for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What benefits or disadvantages

mamaluj [8]

Answer:

Pepsi got into the Indian market market space on time after Coco-cola introduced their product and left. Pepsi came and accumulated alot of market shares which is an advantage for them for early timing and entry. Pepsi get an early entry while the market is developing and grew with the development of the market, thereby accumulating a lot of market shares. and that is an advantage of early entry.

Coca-Cola came back to Indian market space after 15 years, at that time, Coca-Cola would not take market share away from Pepsi companies because the beverage market was growing consistency from year to year with the early birds in the market space. This is disadvantage of Coca-Cola.

7 0

3 years ago