What places were the 4 most important ww2 conferences held at?

History

1 answer:

xeze [42]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:U.S.-British Staff Conference

(ABC-1) Washington, D.C. January 29 – March 27, 1941 American, British, and Canadian military staff Set the basic planning agreement for the U.S. to enter the war

Atlantic Conference

(RIVIERA) Argentia, Newfoundland August 9 – 12, 1941 Churchill and Roosevelt Atlantic Charter, proposal for a Soviet aid conference

First Moscow Conference

(CAVIAR) Moscow, USSR September 29 – October 1, 1941 Stalin, Harriman, Beaverbrook, Molotov Allied aid to the Soviet Union

First Washington Conference

(ARCADIA) Washington, D.C. December 22, 1941 – January 14, 1942 Churchill, Roosevelt Europe first, Declaration by United Nations

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Please read the article on Henry Grady. Summarize his vision for the South using complete sentences. Question 1 options:

rjkz [21]

Whats the rest of the question

7 0

3 years ago

Why did Japan outlaw Christianity in 1640?

madam [21]

Japan outlawed Christianity in 1640 because it sought to get rid of outside influences. As a result, Churches were destroyed, and Christians in Japan subjected to hostilities with some choosing to flee into exile. Others were also forced to publicly denounce their faith

8 0

3 years ago

What was the primary goal of us forces in Iraq in 2003?

frosja888 [35]

to rid the nation of weapons of mass destruction

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do the policies of the War on Terror affect democracy and civil rights in the United States?

vfiekz [6]

<span> Not much at all.

For example - despite all the claims that the Patriot Act has infringed on your rights - haven't you noticed that nobody can quote the section of the Act that says this?

People have a bad habit of believing things without bothering to check facts.
. </span> Source(s): I am probably the only person on YA who has read the Patriot Act.

5 0

3 years ago

Write a paragraph about the idea of land and the conflict between First Nations and Europeans after the Treaties of 1713.

Anastaziya [24]

The impact of treaty making in Canada has been wide-ranging and long standing. The treaties the Crown has signed with Aboriginal peoples since the 18th century have permitted the evolution of Canada as we know it. In fact, much of Canada's land mass is covered by treaties. This treaty-making process, which has evolved over more than 300 years between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in Canada, has its origins in the early diplomatic relationship developed between European settlers and Aboriginal people. As the two parties made economic and military alliances, Canada began to take form. These diplomatic proceedings were the first steps in a long process that has led to today's comprehensive claims agreements between the Crown and Aboriginal groups.Events in Europe often had major impact in the New World. The 1713 Treaty of Utrecht ceded the mainland of the Maritimes, or Acadia, to Great Britain, leaving Île Royal (Cape Breton Island) and Île St-Jean (Prince Edward Island) as the sole French possessions in the area. As Great Britain began to organize and exert its authority over its colony of Nova Scotia, it had to contend not only with the remaining French colonists, but also with France's Aboriginal allies in the region. Fearing Aboriginal people's alliance with the French, the colonial authority negotiated a series of treaties with the Mi'kmaq and Maliseet peoples. Through these treaties made between 1725 to 1779, peace and friendship would be assured between the colony and the Aboriginal population. The Mi'kmaq and Maliseet could benefit from better trade conditions, and the assurance that their religious practices would be undisturbed. On the whole, these treaties were simple agreements with promises of peaceful relations. There were no land cessions whatsoever in the agreements and with the exception of the 1752 and 1760-61 treaties where a specific trade clause was included, these treaties only served to re-establish normal relations between the parties after military conflicts.

8 0

2 years ago