Answer:
True
Explanation:
Ethnic Germans served on both sides of the American Revolutionary War. Many, notably rented auxiliary troops from Germanic states such as the Landgraviate of Hessen-Kassel, supported the Loyalist cause and served as allies of the Kingdom of Great Britain, whose King George III was also the Elector of Hanover.
American rebel agitators misrepresented such troops as mercenaries to fuel propaganda against the British Crown. Even American historians followed suit, in spite of Colonial-era jurists drawing a distinction between auxiliaries and mercenaries, with auxiliaries serving their prince when sent to the aid of another prince, and mercenaries serving a foreign prince as individuals. By this distinction the troops which served in the American Revolution were auxiliaries.
Other German individuals came to assist the American rebels, but most who did so were already colonists.
Because she wants to inspire her daughters.
Answer:
The French and Indian War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years’ War. The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war’s expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Anti-Federalists opposed to ratify the Constitution.
Explanation:
Antifederalism refers to the movement that opposed a strong government of the United States and that later opposed the Constitution of the United States of 1787. The old constitution, called Articles of the Confederation, gave the states more authority against the central government. Directed by Patrick Henry of Virginia, they opposed, among other things, to the new figure of the president that they feared could become a monarchy.
The federalist movement of the 1780s was motivated by the idea that the government of the nation under the Articles of Confederation was too weak, and needed to be modified or replaced. Eventually they got the government to convene a meeting to review the articles. The opponents to its rectification appeared immediately, after the meeting and the approval of the new constitution.
The opposition to federalism was composed of several elements, such as opposition to the constitution because the strong power of the national government threatened the sovereignty of states, localities and individuals, which seemed to them an attempt to disguise a "monarchical" power. Some of the antifederalists thought that the Articles of Cnfederation gave sufficient power to the central government. Others considered that, although the national government with the articles was too weak, with the Constitution it would be too strong.