Answer:
Justice Taney was clearly NOT an abolitionist who wanted to see equal rights achieved for.
Explanation: It made slavery:
In essence, the decision argued that, as someone's property, Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court.
In 1689, parliament declared that James had abdicated by deserting his kingdom. William ( reigned 1689-1702) and Mary (reigned 1689-94) were offered the throne as joint monarchs.
<span>Sometimes a lawsuit is filed so that a plaintiff can satisfy a very personal or profound sense of right and wrong, or to make an important point that impacts more than the parties in the case. It would be under the circumstance when both or one party is interested in settlement that it would be wise to settle out of court to avoid further conflicts.</span>
Answer:
yes because is a racist commensalism a w
