<span>A clear symbol of the oba's power and authority seen on memorial heads are the headrests and necklaces made of Coral beads.</span>
Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
The answer is false.
Hope this is right
Have a good day!
The answer is B. Women were expected to keep quiet in public. During the 1800s women were not allowed to vote and did not earn the same wages as men. Women were not granted the right to vote until the early 1900s and during the 1800s most women had little choices for jobs. Many of the jobs for the women were also low paying.
Answer:
Visual
Explanation:
Pat's interest in dates and events in history indicate that Pat is a visual learner. According to the VARK questionnaire, it provides students with an outline of their knowledge preferences. These choices are about the ways people attend to take in and give out information, students with a visual preference go for like maps, plans, graphs, charts, diagrams.
