"during the years the articles of confederation were in force (1781–1789), there were no national courts and no national judicia
ry. the laws of the united states were interpreted and applied as each state saw fit, and sometimes not at all. disputes between states and between persons who lived in different states were decided, if at all, by the courts in one of the states involved. often, decisions by the courts in one state were ignored by courts in the other states." this excerpt from the text explains why
This excerpt explains why the Articles of Confederation needed to be fixed or replaced with a different constitution. The excerpt goes over several different flaws in the Articles of Confederation including: 1) No national courts to solve issues between individuals from different states.
2) No consistency in laws- In other words, states got to interpret the laws whatever way they wanted.
3) No way to enforce court rulings from state to state.
These weaknesses, plus others, resulted in the need for a new constitution. The US Constitution replaces the Articles of Confederation and is still what we follow today.
The stock market cash led many people to withdraw their deposits/take out loans from the banks. And because people could not pay the banks back for this, it ultimately lead to banks not having enough money to function.
İnönü formed the first coalition government in the history of Turkey with AP. AP claimed to be the successor of the Democrat Party (DP), which had been banned by the leaders of the 1960 coup
Although the aquifer is used by both southwestern Oklahoma and the Panhandle regions, the Panhandle region relies most heavily on water from the Aquifer.
