1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brums [2.3K]
4 years ago
14

Describe three issues, developments, controversies or technologies from the 1920s which still affect our daily news or impact ou

r lives.
History
1 answer:
Free_Kalibri [48]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The 1920s was a decade of the Gregorian calendar that began on January 1, 1920, and ended on December 31, 1929. In North America, it is frequently referred to as the "Roaring Twenties" or the "Jazz Age", while in Europe the period is sometimes referred to as the "Golden Age Twenties" because of the economic boom following World War I. French speakers refer to the period as the "Années folles", emphasizing the era's social, artistic, and cultural dynamism.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Civil Rights and the Vietnam War Test answers
ratelena [41]

Answer: Segregation represents the highest form of discrimination. They differed in the methods of their struggle. The Kennedy administration reacted rationally. A countermeasure of the United States accompanied every movement of the Soviet Union. The Soviets were the first to conquer Earth's orbit.

Explanation:

  • Segregation is one of the highest forms of human rights abuses. There are multiple forms of discrimination, but racial segregation is the most prevalent. It was exceptionally actualized during the 19th and 20th centuries, and unfortunately, it is still present today to some extent. In addition to racial segregation, there is also religious segregation, ethnic segregation.
  • Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were fighters and human rights activists. However, they differed in the methods they exercised to exercise their rights. Martin Luther King propagated non-violence and passive resistance to improve the attitude of the African American population. Malcolm X, on the other hand, was more radical in his pursuit of rights. He promoted the violent rejection of white America, Christian values, and emphasized the supremacy of black over the white race.
  • Malcolm X's death was met with disbelief. Thousands of people mourned the black, nationalist leader. However, some spoke differently. Some US media have called him a pimp, a massive drug addict, and a person who loved guns. The assassination of Martin Luther King resulted in an escalation (to a greater or lesser extent) of violence. Violent protests were a response to his murder. A vast number of people were angry but also sad about killing. There are some testimonies from the south of the state that we're looking forward to King's murder.
  • It can be pointed out that President Kennedy and his administration reacted wisely and cautiously after American spy planes spotted Soviet warheads in Cuba. The administration did not immediately make known to the Soviets and Cubans that they were aware of the situation. After consulting with their people, they decided to make a naval blockade around Cuba. We can say that the Kennedy administration reacted reasonably and calmly.
  • The Soviets place nuclear heads in Cuba. Americans are detecting the same and are preparing a naval blockade of Cuba. America informs the public about the situation and asks the Soviet Union to remove its weapons. The Soviets remove their weapons but ask America not to invade Cuba. America agrees to the Soviet Union's request, plus eliminating nuclear weapons from Turkey. The crisis is ending.
  • During the Cold War, there was a tightening of arms and technological superiority between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was the first to send the uncrewed spacecraft Sputnik 1 into orbit. It happened in October 1957. After this event, the Soviets went one step further, submitting the first man into Earth's orbit. It was Soviet astronaut Yuri Gagarin. It happened in 1961, and his craft made one full circle around the country. The flight was executed successfully, and Gagarin was celebrated as a hero.
4 0
3 years ago
Which conclusion best describes the social impact of the Red Scare and the Immigration Act of 1924?
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

D. An increase in fear of immigrants resulted in decreased empathy for minorities and the working class.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How long a period was prehistory?
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer: Sorry its not a direct answer!

about five million years

Explanation:

Prehistory is the period that begins with the appearance of the human being, about five million years ago, and finishes with the invention of writing, about 6,000 years ago. It is a long period divided into three stages: the Palaeolithic Age, the NeolithicAge and the Metal Age.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s the answer to part a and b
monitta
It’s super blurry:(,, i would totally help if it wasn’t !!
7 0
3 years ago
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Diane nash decision contribute to success
    5·1 answer
  • 1. What was Handy Betsy the Blacksmith known for making?<br> I
    15·1 answer
  • Article 1 of the Constitution list the powers of Congress, those powers are called
    5·1 answer
  • Who was germany s fascist dictator after world war i?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Montesquieu advocate the separation of powers ?
    9·1 answer
  • List five things stereotypes are commonly based upon.
    7·2 answers
  • What was not an advantage the North had over the south at the start of the Civil War ​
    7·1 answer
  • Is an ordinance the same as a law
    15·1 answer
  • What contributed to the success of the middle colonies?
    11·1 answer
  • Si leí 30 páginas de un libro de 100 hojas cuantas me faltan
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!