When jem realizes that judge taylor purposefully picked atticus to protect tom, he comes to comprehend that Judge Taylor hoped Atticus would defend Tom well.
<h3>What did Jem learn?</h3>
Jem realizes that there is worth and meaning in fighting for something good even if failing the fight is inevitable. Atticus hopes his children see a parallel lesson in his decision to defend Tom Robinson even when the price is high and there is no chance that the jury will not find Tom culpable.
<h3>What does Jem learn after the trial?</h3>
After Tom Robinson's trial, Jem is still discovering it difficult to come to terms with Tom's remorseful verdict. He realises that despite all the proof that suggested he was innocent, Tom has been judged not on his efforts but on the colour of his skin.
To learn more about jem realizes, refer
brainly.com/question/5157997
#SPJ4
The advice that Ophelia receives from her brother Laertes is extremely different from the advice her father Polonius gives her. Laertes gently reminds Ophelia that Hamlet might really love her, but since he is in line for the throne he and might not actually be able to choose his wife for himself. He warns her to keep her affection "Out of the shot and danger of desire," meaning to not give in to her desires, otherwise she might ruin herself for future potential husbands. Polonius' advice is a little bit more aggressive. He scolds Ophelia for giving Hamlet too much attention, and says that there is no way Hamlet actually loves her. He says that his vows she "<span>must not take for fire", meaning she should not take his words for true passion. The overall difference between Laertes and Polonius is that Laertes is much gentler, and believes Hamlet might actually have feelings for her right now, and Polonius is putting more blame on Ophelia, saying there is no way Hamlet actually likes her.
</span>
Answer:
In short, Paine has an effective argument against the idea of reconciliation with Great Britain. This is obvious through the logical reasoning he uses, the quotes from previous events, and the continued reminding of unity against division.
A discourse community can be described as a group of people that share common goals, sources of information, terminology, and methods of communication along with a certain level of expertise and knowledge on a subject. However, it is often distinguished from 'speech community' on the grounds that speech communities are sociolinguistic groupings with communicative needs such as socialisation and group solidarity, whereas discourse communities are groupings based on common interests.
It would be c hope this help
