How did prejudice affect the goals of Progressive reformers?

1 answer:

3 0

Progressive reformers during the early 20th century faced backlash from prejudiced people who were racist, because many of the progressive reforms sought to help African Americans.

You might be interested in

• Is there a relation between Deforestation and photosynthesis? Explain your answer.

Vesna [10]

Answer:

$\huge\bold\color{pink}{- Magdonal -}$

$\huge\pink{\overline{\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad}}$

$\begin{gathered}\begin{gathered} \\red{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \pink{ \rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \blue{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \purple{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \end{gathered}\end{gathered}\red{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \pink{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}}\blue{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \purple{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \\blue{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}}\purple{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}} \ \\red{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}}\pink{\rule{10pt}{999999pt}}$

8 0

1 year ago

Explain the Non-cooperation Movement-

morpeh [17]

⛄ANSWER♡࿐⛄

The non-cooperation movement was a political campaign launched on 4 September 1920, by Mahatma Gandhi to have Indians revoke their cooperation from the British government, with the aim of inducing the British to grant self-governance and full independence (Purna Swaraj) to India.

This came as result of the Indian National Congress (INC) withdrawing its support for British reforms following the Rowlatt Act of 18 March 1919—which suspended the rights of political prisoners in sedition trials, and was seen as a "political awakening" by Indians and as a "threat" by the British hand the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 13 April 1919.

<h2> $\mathscr \fcolorbox{blue}{gray}{BE \: BRAINLY}$ </h2>

8 0

2 years ago

Europe does not have a lot of access to water<br> True or false

alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who the was edward vi

wlad13 [49]

Edward was the king of england. he was only nine years old when he was crowned king after his father died.

7 0

3 years ago

WILL GIVE 30 PTS!!!!! HELP

Ainat [17]

D)The ruling undermined the idea of free labor and supported slave labor" since it stated that slaves could not sue for their freedom in court, even if they were in free states.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers