What was a consequence of the fact that the early people of the americas did not have horses or oxen?

1 answer:

3 0

<span>Early people of the Americas used a combination of animals to further their exploration and expansion into new territories. Some populations used horses and oxen as food sources, and did much of their travel on foot, bringing only what they could carry. Others settled in towns, where food and supplies could be purchased or traded.</span>

You might be interested in

In sub-Saharan Africa, female genital mutilation is

Colt1911 [192]

C - definitely not the case, it's very common in Mali
B - also not the case, it's not very common but it's not "unheard of"

As for A and D, it's problematic.
A - hm, this is also not really true, it would be better to call it that it's more common in the east and West and less common in the center
D- In Nigeria 25% of women undergo it, and it also recently banned it - it's not little and it's not "uncommon" but it's less than in other contries in teh region.

so both A and D are partially true, partially false, but I think that A is better than D because the some of the countries where FMG is most present, Mali and Egypt, are in the north and the southern counties have it less.

6 0

2 years ago

One great contribution of the islamic golden age

ExtremeBDS [4]

During the golden age of the Islamic empire,many advancements were made in lots of different areas.New forms of art were created,and new ways of thinking including the beginnings of the mathematics system of algebra emerged as well.

hope it helps. :)

6 0

3 years ago

Which tactic was primarily used by the civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s

drek231 [11]

I believe it is D legal challenges through the court

3 0

3 years ago

Which statement below would an Islamist be most likely to agree with

never [62]

I would say D, but I'm unfamiliar with Islamist's and their ideologies.

4 0

2 years ago