Answer:
Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States;
A Missouri slave sued for his freedom, claiming that his four year stay in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory made free land by the Missouri Compromise had made him a free man. The U.S, Supreme Court decided he couldn't sue in federal court because he was property, not a citizen.
Explanation: im pretty sure its A.
The answer that would make the most sense is bipolar disorder.
Answer:
Short answer no
Explanation:
Throughout the years there have been many different rulers in the United States. As a country we have been able to see what works and what failed based on other countries rulers. One of the things we have seen end badly is fascist dictators. There has only been pain and suffering associated with fascist dictators; like the ruling of Adolf Hitler. With our social advancements and morals of today I do not see our country ever having a fascist dictator.
Answer:
the banks shut down
Explanation:
So the people that had money in the bank went poor
Explanation:
The United States Civil Rights Act of 1964, named in English Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Congressional Law 88-352, 78 United States Statutes at Large 241, enacted on July 2, 1964) is a historic civil and labor law for that country, which was a key piece to prohibit racial discrimination and racial segregation. The Law established a series of mandatory rules for voter registration in the states of the Union, in order to guarantee the right to vote of all citizens and avoid the arbitrariness that in some southern states were used to prevent the vote of The African American population. It also established mandatory rules throughout the country, so that no owner of public access establishments or services (parks, theaters, restaurants, public transport, stadiums, hotels, etc.) could discriminate against people or segregate them on the grounds of "race, color, religion or national origin ", considering that such actions constituted a criminal offense. In education, the law established a procedure to" desegregate "public education and ensure that ethnic differences do not affect equal educational opportunities.1 In labor matters, the law established that it would be considered "illegal employment", any hiring, dismissal or treatment in employment, which implies a discrimination based on "race, color, religion, sex, or national origin" (years later it would be added age over 40 years), establishing a summary procedure to punish the offense and restore the affected worker in the position of work from which he was excluded. Finally, the law created the Commission for Equal Employment Opportunities (EEOC).
