umm i dont know or i cant remember
serves as second-in-command in the executive branch.
The lieutenant-governor asks as a second in charge of a state to the governor. They fill in for the governor when the governor is not available and if the governor has to leave office, the lieutenant-governor takes over as governor. This relationship is similar to the president and vice president in the federal executive branch.
The answer is Spiro Agnew or letter c. He was known for being Nixon’s hatchet man
and was a harsh critic of war protesters and journalists. He was later under investigation on charges
of extortion, tax fraud and bribery by the U.S. Attorney of Maryland and was
replaced by Gerard Ford as Vice President.
The answer is inferred in the last paragraph. When it says "each man, in giving his freedom to all, gives his freedom to no one" means that if we all have the power of decision we all have to consent to a specific outcome or solution together. No one has more power than the otherone. If our wishes align with the desires of the majority of people we have the possibility of those demands or expectations to be fulfilled. Because of that, is in the contract with others where we can maintain, as better as possible, our personal freedom.
On the contrary, if there is just one person in power, for example, the king, <em>his will would be the one being made without taking into account what the subordinates might think or want</em>. In monarchies, if the king ordered someone to do something, they had to do it regardless of what they preferred. In those cases, individual freedom was completly coerced.
To sum up, the power to set and change the rules of society is dispersed among all people in a society ruled by the social contract idea. By sharing the power among everyone the individual maintains its freedom better than when the power is held by a single ruler that withholds all of it.
Akbar took the policy of religious toleration even further by breaking with conventional Islam. The Emperor proclaimed an entirely new state religion of 'God-ism' (Din-i-ilahi) - a jumble of Islamic, Hindu, Christian and Buddhist teaching with himself as deity. It never spread beyond his court and died when he did.