Answer:
Aquaculture has been considered as an option to cope with the world food demand. However, criticisms have arisen around aquaculture, most of them related to the destruction of ecosystems such as mangrove forest to construct aquaculture farms, as well as the environmental impacts of the effluents on the receiving ecosystems. The inherent benefits of aquaculture such as massive food production and economical profits have led the scientific community to seek for diverse strategies to minimize the negative impacts, rather than just prohibiting the activity. Aquaculture is a possible panacea, but at present is also responsible for diverse problems related with the environmental health; however the new strategies proposed during the last decade have proven that it is possible to achieve a sustainable aquaculture, but such strategies should be supported and proclaimed by the different federal environmental agencies from all countries. Additionally there is an urgent need to improve legislation and regulation for aquaculture. Only under such scenario, aquaculture will be a sustainable practice.
What’s the question? That’s more of a statement
The open ocean is more productive in the polar zones than in the equator due to less disturbance to the organisms.
<h3>Why is the open ocean more productive in the polar zones than in the equator?</h3>
In the open seas, heavy winds and deep waters lead to a high turnover in the water column that prevents photosynthetic microorganisms from converting sunlight into energy while on the other hand, there is less disturbance on the polar zones which leads to higher productivity.
So we can conclude that the open ocean is more productive in the polar zones than in the equator due to less disturbance to the organisms.
Learn more about equator here: brainly.com/question/16876469
#SPJ1
Franklin is about 22 miles south of Nashville