<span>The Catholic Church was interested in gaining new converts to the religion.
</span>
The behavioral predictor of members of a social group according to Georg Simmel is the number of people in the group
<h3>Who is Georg Simmel?</h3>
Georg Simmel was an eminent German sociologist and structural theorist who studied urban life as well as the metropolis' structure.
He was notable for developing social theories that promoted a technique of studying society that differed from the then-accepted scientific approach used to investigate the natural environment.
In his studies, he states that the behavioral predictor of members of a social group is the<u> number </u><u>of </u><u>people</u> in the group.
Learn more about Georg Simmel here:
brainly.com/question/3065333
Answer:
According to current research, one factor that could be contributing to Dianna's language learning difficulty is her lack of: <u>early exposure to words</u>.
Explanation:
It is known by the theories of children early development, that the exposure to language during the first years is essential for building language. If Dianna had a lack of exposure to words in the first five years this would be the cause of her diffculty in language learning.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
