Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
The navajo tribe has no members that speak english today.
Generally speaking, no, Aristotle's writing did not have aa major effect on the U.S. Constitution since he was in fact a proponent of strong centralized rule in a a nation, unlike the Founding Fathers.
To express opinions, they do it so that one party does not have complete power over the other.
