<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer to this question is B) a supreme being is, by nature, good.
Explanation:
Rousseau would support the idea that a supreme being is, by nature, good.
Jean-Jaques Rousseau (1712-1778) was a Swiss philosopher that inspired the ideas of the French Revolution. His ideas have transcended generations to modern-day times, for the importance of liberty as a universal aspiration for humans. In that sense, Rousseau supported the idea that a supreme being is, by nature, good.
Most likely you answer may be Rensselaerswyck a Dutch(German) colony.
I may be wrong.
<span>C. sending the case to a US court of appeals for a decision</span>
you dont show any options so here are some examples.
-Ronald Reagan began the practice of Saturday morning radio broadcast to speak about specific politics
-President Bill Clinton and President George W. Bush held town meetings to advocate it their positions on policies they support
