Evaluation of unanticipated adverse device effects (UADDEs) must be reported to the FDA by the IRB and all investigators participating in the test of the product within ten working days.
<h3>What is IRB and FDA?</h3>
The full meaning of IRB is Institutional Review Board, while the full meaning of FDA is the United States Food and Drugs Administration - a Federal Agency.
The above bodies are responsible for protecting American citizens from harmful products.
Learn more about FDA and IRB at;
brainly.com/question/17432443
#SPJ11
<span>They had more soldiers, they had more commanders, using the commanders advantage; they usually flanked Lee for easy victories.</span>
Answer:
- It is difficult to produce a highly detailed image of the brain.
Explanation:
Brain-imaging techniques are associated with the use of strategies that assist in either directly or obliquely imaging the structure, operation, or working of the human brain and the nervous system. It assists the researchers to evaluate the problems associated with the brain of a human.
As per the given description, the limitation of brain-imaging would not include that 'it is difficult to produce a highly detailed image of the brain' as brain-imaging allows us to produce even the 'activation maps reflecting flow of blood to several parts of the brain' through fMRI and various other techniques allows to image the functionality in order to know the problems within the brain. Therefore, this goes against the limitations.
Answer:
The answer is autonomy.
Explanation:
Both Ryan and Deci were interested in autonomy as a motor for wellness: it made sense for them that people enjoyed doing something in which they could get their best experience and achieve their best performance. In other words, autonomy refers to an internal motivation for doing any given activity. This is, doing something because we want to do it.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
