D. The federal government would use its powers to protect, not threaten individual liberties
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that US foreign policy became more strict due to the crisis. The strict policy has affected those innocent firms and the cash flow are oppressed
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:
Advantages
They have the ability to experiment freely with innovative approaches and, if necessary, to take risks.
They are flexible in adapting to local situations and responding to local needs and therefore able to develop integrated projects, as well as sectoral projects.
They enjoygood rapport with people and can render micro-assistance to very poor peope as they can identify those who are most in need and tailor assistance to their needs.
They have the ability to communicate at all levels, from the neighbourhood to the top levels of government.
They are able to recruit both experts and highly motivated staff with fewer restrictions than the government.
Disadvantages
Paternalistic attitudes restrict the degree of participation in programme/project design.
Restricted/constrained ways of apporach to a problem or area.
Redued replicability of an idea, due to non-representativeness of the project or selected area, relatively small project coverage, dependence on outside financial resources, etc.
"Territorial possessiveness" of an area or project reduces cooperation between agencies, seen as threatening or competitive.
Explanation:
Answer:
e) Traditional interpretations are questioned by revisionists.
Explanation:
History is always open to ongoing and changing interpretations due to the revisionists questioning of the interpretations of the traditionalists. In addition new evidence can become available, or differing conclusions are drawn from prior research.
im pretty sure this is the answer. Hope this helped.
