C.Nations did not understand the extensive implications this war would have. <span>
</span>
Answer:
<h3>country with an absolute monarchy would have no democratic values while in a country with constitutional monarchy, the power would be shared within the monarchy and the people.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
A country with an absolute monarchy would have no democratic values as the overall power would be in the hands of a monarchy. Such countries would be governed by a single person and all citizens would be a subject to the king/queen.
On the other hand, a country with constitutional monarchy would have a monarchical system but the monarchy would exercise its power in accordance to the constitution. The monarchy is not sovereign and the power would be shared within the monarchy and the people.
In a transition from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, <u>the common people</u> are gaining more power or representation.
The diseases in the Americas and Pacific Island <u>devastated the lives of the isolated native people. It dislocated and destroyed their social systems as they had no cure or immunity to diseases from the outside world</u>.
It did not hold back European expansion in these areas because <u>most Europeans were immune to such diseases. Instead, it gave an advantage to the colonists from Europe to easily defeat the ailing natives.</u>
I am pretty sure the answer is Anne Bradstreet.
Answer:
In the period from 1895 to 1905, the legal formation of the basic doctrine of American hegemony and the organization of the American Great Space was completed. The Monroe Doctrine was expanded into the Olney Doctrine (1895) and the addition of Theodore Roosevelt (1904), which directly proclaimed US claims for the right to exercise “international police force” in Latin America. The new US foreign policy doctrine was set out in a note of protest by US Secretary of State Olney of July 20, 1895 to the British government over its actions against Venezuela. The Olney Doctrine was designed to make 'tremble' not only with England and other European powers, but also the Latin American states themselves, whose interests the United States allegedly defended.
Olney doctrine has become the foundation of US power politics around the world, although the United States still used the Monroe Doctrine for propaganda and mystification of history. In Olney Doctrine, the principles of 1823 were combined with the idea of US hegemony in the Western Hemisphere; further development of the Monroe Doctrine led to its merging with the principles of interventionism.
Explanation:
It might be said that the warming climate affected the paleo- Indians by allowing people to grow more plants and have a better gardening food quality. On the other hand, it helped fishing as fish were more abundant. The quality of food and the amount of fish, plus the remaining lands to be used are the main factors that impacted on the people leaving in the Americans at that time. <span />
