Answer:
The Nazi military tactic that led to their rapid success in World War II was the blitzkrieg.
Explanation:
Blitzkrieg is a military tactic based on the combination of mechanization, air power and telecommunications, aimed at the development of rapid and overwhelming maneuvers designed to break down enemy lines at their weakest points and then proceed to encircle and destroy isolated units, without giving any ability to react, given the constant state of movement of the attacking units.
Crowned by a resounding success during World War II, in the countryside of Poland, France and the Balkans, the Blitzkrieg showed the first shortcomings during the Barbarossa Operation. In fact, while on the western battlefields the operational distances were estimated in the order of tens of miles (allowing the mechanized infantry to almost never lose contact with the advancing armored units), in the endless Russian steppes the formations often ended up enormously lengthening, distributing the attack units along impressive-sized routes, making the aggregate infantry accumulate delays in the order of days with respect to the Panzer-Division.
Only representatives can introduce bills in the House of Representatives. Ideas can come from representatives or citizens. Once the bill is "introduced" then a clerk (bill clerk) will give it a number and then another clerk (reading clerk) will read the bill(s) to the representatives. Then the bill goes to a standing committee ( a committee in the House or Senate that will consider bills in a certain subject area).
Answer:
France suffered more severe economic problems than the American colonists. Both the American and French revolutionaries issued documents declaring independence.
Explanation:
William Penn, who was the first governor of Pennsylvania, founded it on the principles of it being a place where people of different religions could come and not be persecuted. So B would be the most likely answer to your question :)
This statement is technically valid in the sense that both the Federalist and Anti-Federalists believed in the future of the Union--it was just that they differed on how they thought the Union would progress.
