Answer:
Michel de Montaigne
Explanation:
Sometimes it's easier to look this up rather than type out a question.
Answer:
The end of a complete sentence should be marked by a period, a question mark, or an exclamation point. If a sentence is not complete and it is terminated by a period, we have a sentence fragment as in the sentence below.
Explanation:
Tan switches from a formal to a narrative structure in this essay because it reflects her insights on language. The author describes how her mother's developing English has effected her realizations about communication and how it affects her life. Thus Tan used narration as a tool to best express her reflections. This descriptive style helped readers understand the author's experiences and relate to them. It guides readers to visualize what immigrants go through when they try to communicate. The narrative essay is an effective form because it provides scenarios that can make readers see the author's main point of view. It also gives readers a richer experience when understanding the author's message.
Answer:
The scene is similar in that they both took Winnie Foster away from her safety zone, displacing her from her own comfortable place.
But then again, the situations are different as Mae had no evil intention behind her decision to take Winnie. But the man, on the other hand, had far more sinister ideas in mind behind the 'offer' to 'rescue' Winnie from the Tucks.
Explanation:
Natalie Babbitt's children novel <em>Tuck Everlasting</em> tells the story of how a family came to be immortal from their accidental drinking of water from a stream in the forest. And it is this 'immortality' that led to the disastrous event which led to the loss of a good friend Winnie.
When the<em> "man in the yellow suit"</em> took Winnie against her will to return her back to her family, Mae/ Mother Tuck took her husband's shotgun. She fired and killed the man, for she knows that the man wanted nothing but evil intentions. When asked why she did what she did, she replied that <em>"he was taking the child against against her will"</em> which is also exactly what she did.
These two situations of Winnie being taken away against her will are similar in that the two adults took advantage of her, without asking for her approval. Winnie had no choice but do what she is told to do so.
But for Mae, she had no evil intention except reveal the truth about her family's immortality and also provide a chance for her family to have an interaction with a real, living <em>"natural child"</em>. But the man had wanted to 'trade' on the water, trying to get it t more deserving people. That is how different the two situations are.
