Answer:
"hygiene"
Explanation:
According to my research on the studies conducted by Psychologist Frederick Irving Herzberg, I can say that the factors being described in the question are "hygiene" factors. Herzberg even named his theory the motivator-hygiene theory, also known as the two-factor theory of job satisfaction.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
60 percent
Explanation:
Contribution margin refers to the revenue a firm derives after deducting the variable cost it has incurred.
Contribution margin = Sales - Variable costs
Contribution margin or contribution to sales ratio represents the percentage of contribution a firm earns from the sale of it's output.
It is represented mathematically as,
= 
Also, contribution margin ratio = 100 - variable cost ratio percentage.
Hence, contribution margin for three departments would be: 
A = 100 - 30% = 70%
B = 100 - 40% = 60%
C = 100- 50% = 50%
This represents if sales revenue is 100, contribution margin earned is 70, 60 and 50 under three cases.
Since sales revenue in all three departments is the same, let us assume the sales revenue of a department as y.
 
    
Thus, weighted average contribution margin would be, 60 percent
 
        
             
        
        
        
One of the biggest ethical risks in supply chain management is that the <u>most visible</u> supply chain member tends to be the one that suffers the blame and/or lost goodwill when something goes wrong.most visible.
<h3>What is ethical risk?</h3>
- In reaction to their unethical behaviors, actors end up externalizing their locus of control, as if they had no other choice.
-  In this manner, actors reduce their own power to identify a profitable alternative course of action. They reduce their freedom to choose. 
- On the other hand, inclusive awareness of ethical and unethical aspects triggers a natural search for more ethical actions (Cf. Psychological attitudes towards ethical dissonance). 
- A rational analysis of the interest of such a more ethical alternative allows avoiding exaggeration of its costs (without proper analysis, a typical justification of an unethical action is that an alternative course of action would be too costly). 
- Further, awareness of potential ethical costs increases the relative attractiveness of an alternative more ethical action. The re-framing of the situation allows the identification of new opportunities otherwise hidden to the actors.
To learn more about ethical risk from the given link
brainly.com/question/8377024
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
Gap's cost of goods sold is $10,258 million and Cash paid to supplier is $10,447 million.
Let understand that Cost of good sold refers to amount of expenses incurred to produce the goods produced by a firm.
- The formulae for deriving the Cost of Goods Sold is {Beginning Inventories + Purchases – Ending Inventories}.
- Information given are <em>Purchased inventories $10,392, Ending inventories $2,131 and Beginning inventories $1,997</em>
<em />
Cost of goods sold = $1,997 + $10,392 - $2,131
Cost of goods sold = $10,258
- In conclusion, the amount of Gap's cost of goods sold is $10,258
Let understand that Cash paid to accounts payable refers to net amount paid to supplier of goods.
 
- The formulae for deriving the Cash paid to accounts payable is  Beginning balance for 2015 + Purchases - Ending balance for 2015
Cash paid to accounts payable = $1,181 + $10,392 - $1,126
Cash paid to accounts payable = $10,447
- In conclusion, the amount of Gap's Cash paid to supplier is $10,447
Learn from similar solution here
<em>brainly.com/question/16805564</em>
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C  $ 3,113.036
Explanation:
First step will be calcualte the future value of the bond and stock funds:
 
 
C       1,100 
time	180 ( 15 years x 12 months)
rate	0.005833333 (7% divided into 12 months)
 
 
PV	$348,658.5264 
 
 
C        500
time	180
rate	0.003333 (4% divided by 12 months)
 
 
PV	$123,045.2441 
total fund: 348,658.5264 + 123,045.2441 = 471,703,7705
Then this will be placed to yield 5% and we will do motnly withdrawals:
we need to calcualte the PTM of this annuity:
 
 
PV  $471,703.77 
time	240
rate	0.004166667
 
 
C  $ 3,113.036