How did the attitudes of Native Americans and white settlers toward nature differ?

History

2 answers:

Oksanka [162]2 years ago

7 0

Last one: Native Americans believed nature was sacred while white settlers believed nature was a resource.

Brut [27]2 years ago

7 0

The correct answer is D) Native Americans believed nature was sacred. White settlers believed nature was a resource.

The attitudes of Native Americans and white settlers toward nature differ in that Native Americans believed nature was sacred. White settlers believed nature was a resource.

White European settlers and colonists wanted more land to settle in and make a profit. White people believed that nature was a resource and needed to be exploited: too many natural resources and raw materials. On the other hand, Native American Indian tribes considered Mother Nature as sacred, that is why they honored nature, the land, with chants and dances to show appreciation for all nature provide.

You might be interested in

What led to President George H. W. Bush's decline in popularity after it reached an all-time high after the Persian Gulf War?

Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer: Among the factors that slowed George Bush's popularity are rising taxes and rising fuel prices.

Explanation:

George HW Bush was President of the United States of America between 1989 and 1993, during his tenure various events of great importance took place, such as the end of the Soviet Union, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf war.

In 1992 he launched his political campaign for a 2nd term, however, his popularity had decreased due to the increase in taxes during the last year, to the criticism he received about the handling of the Persian Gulf War and the recession that was entering the country. He also received criticism about the increase in fuel prices as a direct result of the Gulf War.

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

7 0

3 years ago

A result of the comparatively high standard of living in rural pennsylvania and the surrounding middle colonies between 1720 and

ehidna [41]

<span>Pennsylvania was a colony known as the best poor Man’s country in the entire world. The high standards of living in rural Pennsylvania and the neighboring middle colonies resulted in the doubling of consumption of imported goods from England. The least wealthy 18th New Englanders lived a more comfortable life.</span>

8 0

2 years ago

Why did the American revolution start in great Britain?

Alchen [17]

Answer:

In April 1775 British soldiers, called lobsterbacks because of their red coats, and minutemen—the colonists' militia—exchanged gunfire at Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. Described as "the shot heard round the world," it signaled the start of the American Revolution and led to the creation of a new nation.

8 0

2 years ago

For Africans, European colonization resulted inImmersive Reader More wealth and power, less education Expanded control of trade

Anna [14]

Answer:

Loss of lands, loss of trade, some gains in health and literacy

Explanation:

The direct European colonization of Africa started in the late nineteenth century and lasted till the late twentieth century. It was termed New Imperialism and it resulted in different outcomes for the continent.

However majorly, the European colonization of Africa resulted in "Loss of lands, loss of trade, some gains in health and literacy."

This is because, during this period, it was the Europeans that were controlling the African lands and its resources, including its trades.

However, the Africans were exposed and gain better health facilities and were educated in western education.

8 0

2 years ago

Why was the declaration of independence aimed at a foreign as well as domestic audience?

True [87]

To gain support from other nations against the British

4 0

2 years ago