Market Penetration, According to Yahoo Answers
Answer:
D. All the answers are correct to increase the benefit of the company. here briefly why.
Explanation:
A . increasing the price of product B (whenever possible) does not affect its variable costs or fixed costs, which would result in a higher profit margin.
B. Increasing the marketin plans of product A means an increase in costs, if with fixed costs for advertising campaigns the contribution margin per unit will be the same, but total sales increase. If the marketing campaign affects variable costs (such as reducing the sales price by a certain amount), it will result in a smaller unit contribution, but a larger amount of sales, which will increase profits.
C. The reduction of these variable or any other variable cost (whenever possible) of product B will result in a greater unit contribution, then, increase profits
Option C, Increase the training of his employees.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Human capital is the investment which the company has in its workers form. It takes into consideration the added value of employees ' knowledge, skills, and experience. An individual on the workforce or through learning acquires the skills. The added capabilities raise Human resources.
The notion of human capital acknowledges that the value that they add to the company and all kinds of employees is different. The value of a worker's human capital is different from that of a senior management's human capital.
The HR department of a company is responsible for managing human capital.
Answer:
A decrease in a firm's WACC will increase the attractiveness of the firm's investment options.
Explanation:
hope this helps you :)
ANSWER:
Issue: Oral agreement; without proper documentation of what was agreed upon.
Decision: Avarice will loss the case, and Joe will be set free by the court.
Support: Because Avarice does not have any valid prove to show that Joe accepted to repay Bob loans in case he fails to pay up, the court will assume Avarice is forging a claim on Joe. A withiness only comes to court to testify the validity of a prove. Because Avarice does not have any prove, the witness is as good as nothing.
The court will dismiss the case because Avarice became unethical by granting the request made by Joe without any signed agreement or recorded call conversation.
