Answer:
fnjfnfnr
Explanation:
shut up and use your brain
In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.
1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.
2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.
3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.
4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.
Answer:
A. The mainland was not badly damaged and the war industries were turned into production sites for the production of goods for the increasing population.
B. Advancement in technology and increase in consumer's spending.
Explanation:
This period was the post WW II era in the 1950's, It was a period that brought about the speedy growth in the economy prosperity of the U.S. This was due to the low damaged the war caused on the country and the bad damage that was done to other super powers of the world who were the major supplier of goods before the war.
Moreover, there was massive growth in the population which resulted into high demand for goods there by leading into massive production wish in return lead to an economy boom because the war industries were turned into production sites to produce goods.
It was a period that was tagged "BABY BOOM" where the economy grew by 37% and brought about high spending by consumer due to availability of jobs that resulted into high wages.