Answer:
A-The leader of the Ottawa nation attacked the British.
Explanation:
The Ottawa nation leader was called "Pontiac" this gives the war its name "The Pontiacs War", a confederacy of native americans were dissatisfied with the British policies in the Great Lakes, this made Pontiac lead its army of native americans to the fort of Detroit in order to take the supplies and weaponery that the British had there and then attack other forts that were located on former French land, as they couldn´t actually take any fort they began a siege with several forts that was finally defeated in 1766 when the British sent extra troops and re-inforcements and the French didn´t want to ally with the indians to recover their lands.
The answer to this really depends on what prism you are viewing it from?
As a globe, we are pretty opposed to imperialism these days. China has started to dabble a little more in the South China Sea but we mostly have our nation states and there isn't really a lot of movement.
That was not the case at the time of annexation.
So, is it ethical to subsume a sovereign nation? No
Was it strategically justifiable at the time? Yes. If the United States had not annexed Hawaii, the Empire of Japan likely would have stepped in.
Hawaii has enormous strategic value and was then justifiable at the time of annexation.
That being said, and I hope this is an obvious statement, imperialism is not a good thing and is ethically problematic.
A is not true 1984 Mondale Democrat nomatied a women for vice president
C is not true Jesse Jackson ran for president
the answer is 100 percent B
Feed the animals, clean the barn, bale the hay, go to the market, or even hunt for dinner.
