What is the formula for distance?

valkas [14]

Answer:

[-7, 0]

Step-by-step explanation:

The range describes all values that y can take on. You may notica that the highest point of the graph has an y coordinate of 0 while the lowest has one of -7. Both values are included because they have filled in dots: this means the parenthesis are closed. So, the range would be: [-7, 0]. An alternate way to write this is $-7\leq y \leq 0$ .

4 0

3 years ago

a store has some sale on let supplies the price of each item is marked down 25% the store also offers a coupon for 5 off for whe

mylen [45]

0.25+5x is the expression

8 0

3 years ago

What is the distance from (-4,0) to (2,5)

Svetllana [295]

Answer:

√61 ≈ 7.81

Step-by-step explanation:

Distance formula:

√(x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)²

√(2 - (-4))² + (5 - 0)²

√(2 + 4)² + 5²

√6² + 5²

√36 + 25

√61

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve for x please help

Agata [3.3K]

Step-by-step explanation:

4x + 2 + 3x + 3 = 180 (straight angle)

4x + 3x + 2 + 3 = 180

7x + 5 = 180

7x = 175

x = 25°

6 0

3 years ago

A random sample of 500 adult residents of Maricopa County found that 356 were in favor of increasing the highway speed limit to

zzz [600]

Answer:

$z=1.04$

$p_v =2*P(Z>1.04)\approx 0.298$

Comparing the p value with the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can't say that the proportion of people in favor of the increased speed limit not differs significantly between the two groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{PC}=297$ represent the number of residents of Pima County in favor of the increased speed limit

$X_{MC}=356$ represent the number of residents of Maricopa County in favor of the increased speed limit

$n_{PC}=400$ sample of Pima County selected

$n_{MC}=500$ sample of Maricopa County selected

$p_{PC}=\frac{297}{400}=0.743$ represent the proportion of residents of Pima County in favor of the increased speed limit

$p_{MC}=\frac{356}{500}=0.712$ represent the proportion of residents of Maricopa County in favor of the increased speed limit

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level given

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference in the support for in increasing the speed limit between the residents of the two counties, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{PC} - p_{MC}=0$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{PC} - \mu_{MC} \neq 0$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{PC}-p_{MC}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{PC}}+\frac{1}{n_{MC}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{PC}+X_{MC}}{n_{PC}+n_{MC}}=\frac{297+356}{400+500}=0.726$

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.743-0.712}{\sqrt{0.726(1-0.726)(\frac{1}{400}+\frac{1}{500})}}=1.04$

4) Statistical decision

Since is a two side test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z>1.04)\approx 0.298$

Comparing the p value with the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can't say that the proportion of people in favor of the increased speed limit not differs significantly between the two groups.

8 0

3 years ago