Answer:
States usually create the laws of their countries and governments can break their own laws. This led Penny Green and Tony Ward in 2005 to define state crime as "illegal or deviant activity perpetrated by or with the complicity of state agencies". The genocide in Rwanda is an example.
Human rights are the challenge of changing norms and values. Wanting to apply Western standards to all societies would be a difficult argument for many individuals. It does not seem acceptable to argue that women should have fewer rights in Saudi Arabia than in the United Kingdom.
State crimes are not reported because states and the government do not always share the same values and norms.
Explanation:
Federal as the picture says in bold it is federal.
Supreme court has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a federal law or action is constitutional.
What is the role of Supreme court ?
- For all issues and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States, the Court is the highest tribunal in the country. The Supreme Court serves as the final arbiter of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter.
- According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in idea and function." Few other courts in the world have the same constitutional interpretation authority, and none have used it as extensively or for as long.
- The strong adherence of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government is a major contributor to the Supreme Court's unique position.
To know more about Supreme court visit:
brainly.com/question/2528721
#SPJ4
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
